CONTACT AN ATTORNEY
© 2013 HUSSEIN & WEBBER, PL | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP
RONCO BUILDING | 630 WEST ADAMS STREET, SUITE 206 | JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32204
In the practice of criminal defense in Florida, there are certain myths that an attorney routinely encounters in his or her dealings with clients and the general public. One common example concerns the requirement of a driver’s license for the operation of a moped or a “motorized bicycle” on a Florida public street or highway. The myth is typically expressed as follows:
“Even if my driving privileges have been suspended or revoked, I can legally drive a “moped” or “motorized bicycle” on a public street or highway in Florida because neither is considered a “motor vehicle” for purposes of the Florida driver’s license statute.”
The following article discusses the Florida statutes and case decisions governing the operation of “mopeds” and “motorized bicycles” without a valid driver’s license. Contrary to popular belief, all mopeds and most vehicles commonly thought of as “motorized bicycles” require a valid driver’s license to be lawfully operated on a public street or highway.
The statutory provisions governing driver’s licenses in Florida are contained in Chapter 322, Florida Statutes. Under Section 322.03, Florida Statutes, “a person may not drive any motor vehicle upon a highway in this state unless such person has a valid driver’s license issued under [Chapter 322].” Under Section 322.34, Florida Statutes, a person who drives a motor vehicle upon a highway while his or her driver’s license has been canceled, suspended, or revoked, commits a either a moving violation or a criminal traffic offense, depending on whether the person knew of the suspension, cancellation, or revocation. The offense of driving with a suspended, revoked, or canceled driver’s license with knowledge may be classified as a second degree misdemeanor (first conviction), a first degree misdemeanor (second conviction), or a third degree felony (third or subsequent conviction).
The definition of “motor vehicle” for offenses committed under Chapter 322 is contained in Section 322.01(27), Florida Statutes. Section 322.01(27) defines “motor vehicle” as:
Although 322.01(27) refers to Section 316.003 as the definition of “motorized bicycle,” in actuality Section 316.003 defines the term “bicycle” and contains within the definition of “bicycle” a description of “motorized bicycle.” However, Florida courts have universally interpreted this description as the operative definition of motorized bicycle for purposes of the licensure requirements of Chapter 322. Section 316.003(2), Florida Statutes, defines bicycle (and motorized bicycle) as follows:
[E]very vehicle propelled solely by human power, and every motorized bicycle propelled by a combination of human power and an electric helper motor capable of propelling the vehicle at a speed of not more than 20 miles per hour on level ground . . . having two tandem wheels, and including any device generally recognized as a bicycle though equipped with two front or two rear wheels.
Florida Case Law: “Mopeds”
Florida courts have specifically addressed the requirement of driver’s license in
the context of a so-
On appeal, the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal held that a moped was a “motor
vehicle” for purposes of charges brought under Chapter 322.34. Using the definition
of motor vehicle contained in Section 322.01(27), the court concluded that a moped
was a self-
As in Meister, other Florida courts have rejected the argument that a gasoline moped is excluded from the definition of “Motor Vehicle” so as not to require a driver’s license. See Wood v. State, 717 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (holding that a moped is a “motor vehicle” which requires a driver’s license for operation under 322.34); Jones v. State, 721 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (holding that a valid driver’s license is required for the operation of a “moped” under 322.34(2)).
Florida Case Law: Electric “Scooters”
Florida courts have further rejected the argument that an electric scooter is not
a “motor vehicle” in the context of a charge brought under Section 322.34, Florida
Statutes (driving on a suspended or revoked license). In Inman v. State, 916 So.
2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), the defendant was cited for driving on a suspended or revoked
driver’s license while driving a seated, two-
On appeal, the Second District Court of Appeal of Florida held that, because the defendant’s vehicle did not operate by a combination of an electric motor and human pedaling, the vehicle fell outside of the definition of motorized bicycle as contained in Section 322.01(27). Thus, the defendant could be properly convicted of driving on a suspended or revoked license, even if his electric scooter had many of the key attributes of a motorized bicycle.
Chapter 322, Florida Statutes requires the operator of a “motor vehicle” on a highway
of the state to have a valid license. As defined in Chapter 322, “Motor vehicle”
is anything that is self-
In interpreting this provision, Florida appellate courts across the State have taken the view that the law means exactly what it says. They have furthermore rejected all legal challenges brought on grounds that the law is unconstitutionally vague or ambiguous. If it is a “moped” powered by gasoline, it requires a license. If the vehicle is powered exclusively by battery, it requires a license. If the propulsion for the vehicle does not derive from a combination human and electric power, then it requires a license. Only those vehicles falling within the narrow exception provided in 316.003 are exempt from the requirement of a driver’s license.
|Exposure of Sexual Organs|
|Resisting Arrest With Violence|
|Possession of Marijuana|
|Sale of Cannabis|
|Possession of Paraphernalia|
|Violation of Probation|
|Sealing and Expunging|
|Leaving the Scene of an Accident|